RDR2 has a lot of content the question becomes whether or not it's content you would enjoy. Not sure if this answers your question, but I like the story, I like the characters, and even though I haven't finished it, I think I generally enjoyed it more than Cyberpunk.
#Saints row 2 map vs san andreas map Pc
(FWIW, I bought it not long after its release on PC and don't regret it I only wish I'd waited until the slew of patches had subsided.) If not, then no amount of content will make it more worthwhile, I don't think. I think the real question needs to be, "Do I want to play a game where I'm dealing with horses most of the time, and wandering and hunting the rest of the time, in a sprawling country vista?" The game is gorgeous and laid back (most of the time), so if that's what you want to play, I'd say go for it. Which I know happened in W3 (and every other game), but I feel like the familiarity is more obvious in RDR2, simply because there are only so many ways to mix it up when it comes to robbery, shootouts, and chases on horseback. A lot of RDR2 missions are just variations on a theme. When you factor in the DLC, I think Witcher 3 had considerably more content, or at least more varied. I know nothing about an "ultimate" edition, but like you said, I doubt it's worth paying 60% more. Now I have a new video card and SSD, and am preparing to reinstall it and give it another go. I haven't beaten it yet myself, though that's mainly because I got tired of my settings getting messed up every time they patched it, causing it to crash on me, so I switched over to finishing The Witcher 3. It is slower paced than Cyberpunk, Saint's Row games, and probably even Witcher 3. So for a fan of open world games with RPG elements and good story, will RDR2 prove worthy enough for the money paid? Thanks in advance for the guidance.Ĭlick to expand.RDR2 has a lot of content the question becomes whether or not it's content you would enjoy. This is how I rate the games listed above. Saints row games were finished very quickly, and the side content got repetitive pretty quickly for me. Is the game that good that it's price is still on the expensive side? Do you think RDR2 offers enough content for me to play for next few months atleast? Witcher 3 was perfect for me in terms of content. I bought CP2077 on release for lesser price from GOG ( GOG is usually more expensive for me than steam ). I may miss a few single player missions, but I don't think that makes ultimate edition worth the 60% extra cost. Not even thinking about ultimate edition as I am not interested in RDR2 online. I would have bought it without much thoughts, but the game is still expensive even after 3 years of release and that too standard edition. Just needed some advice from people who actually played it on PC especially. Although the last one was like a speed run to finish the story. In last 7 months I finished Cyberpunk 2077 twice, finished Witcher 3 and its expansions for the third time, completed Saints Row 3 remastered, 4 & Gat out of hell once.
0 kommentar(er)
